Fundraising answers

What does a school read-a-thon plan look like?

Reviewed . Read as Markdown

This illustrative plan runs a two-week reading challenge alongside a Raised read-a-thon campaign. Teachers approve the reading rules, caregivers share participant links and the school chooses its visibility settings. It is not a published school result or a promise that a campaign will reach its target.

Purpose, activity and responsibilities

The school chooses a library project and sets a budget from actual costs. Teachers decide that reading minutes will be recorded in a simple log and confirmed by a caregiver. Supported reading and class reading can count under the same published rules.

The organiser manages the campaign and supporter questions; teachers manage the activity. The reading log is an example of school-run evidence, not a claim that the platform automatically verifies books or minutes.

Message families can adapt

Message template: "Our read-a-thon runs from [date] to [date] for [purpose]. Please use [participant link] if you want support credited to your child. Record reading using [school process]. Children can join the activity whether or not their families fundraise. Please follow our display-name and sharing guidance."

Explain the contribution options actually available on your live page. Do not promise a specific pledge calculation or charge date without checking the chosen format.

Budget and review

Illustration: 80 contributions averaging NZ$20 would total NZ$1,600 before any fees or expenses. This is an arithmetic scenario, not expected participation. If the school absorbs fees, budget for them; if supporters pay them, explain the additional cost.

Review confirmed activity separately from money received. Thank families and report the school's retained amount. The Pyes Pa maths-a-thon case study is evidence that a school has used an athon on Raised, not evidence that the example's reading rules were used there.

What does a school read-a-thon plan look like? | Raised